Remember Me

Recent Uploads

Hot Downloads

Most Popular

Ornamental Gold on wood
 
This location is for Registered Users Only.
Please login or Register.

Thumbnails:

Description:Another Ornamental material Gold on Wood,this time, with displacement map for to put in value the volume of material. Made it in A&D material:I used 3 maps:"diffuse map", "bump map" and "displacement map" at resolution 2048x2048 pixels and d.p.i.72 pixels/inch. All made in Photoshop. Later edit:I fix the blur problems and rescale to 2048/2048 with base main pattern 1024x4,
License:Free for all to use!
Submitted On:07 Mar 2010
Submitted By:Volinschi Sergiu (Sergiu)
File Date:07 Mar 2010
File Author:Volinschi Sergiu
File Version:3ds max 2009
File Size:6,329.59 Kb
File Type:rar
Downloads:314
Rating:
stars/5.gifTotal Votes:1
Trackback(0)
Comments (8)Add comments
feedSubscribe to this comment's feed
Russell L Thomas wrote on March 02, 2010
 
Title: Texture Quality
You have very large texture files (files add up to 17.3 megs archived) and yet at actual pixel viewing they are blurry as if you started with a lower resolution file and up-sampled them. I reduced them by a factor of 4 in a bi-cubic sharpen 3 step method and will render it out to see if there is any downgrade in quality, by I think it will look just as good and reduce the overall file sizes tremendously.
report abuse
vote down
vote up

Votes: -1
Volinschi Sergiu wrote on March 02, 2010
 
Title: Texture
I'm not sure if I understand you correct. Can explain the size of the files with stupidity of beginner or is Russian influence(ha!ha!)...I can say that I built my maps pixel by pixel; I design the base of model on 1024/1024 and placed x16 in 4096/4096 all in 72 d.p.i. I wonder if is correct and what size is indicated ? On my object I do not obtain the same bump/displacement is attenuate(visible) and smooth is lowest too.
report abuse
vote down
vote up

Votes: +0
Russell L Thomas wrote on March 02, 2010
 
Title: No Time
I haven't had the time to render out and check, I was just saying that your images seemed a bit blurry as if you started out with 1024 x 1024 pixels and in PS you increased the image size. I could be wrong, but you can't just tell PhotoShop to make a 1024 x 1024 a 4096 x 4096 and get a good quality image. Maybe you took a 1024 x 1024 and mirrored it in x and y directions to twice to get a 4096 x 4096 which would be increasing the pixel resolution and should produce an image as good as the original. Perhaps the original image was a bit blurry and hence by me reducing size while sharpening created a better looking image. I was just commenting on what I saw when I inspected the textures.

It is all good and I thank you for sharing your creation with us.
report abuse
vote down
vote up

Votes: +0
Volinschi Sergiu wrote on March 02, 2010
 
Title: ...
Thank you very much ! I'm much honored !
I just explain how I proceed is not my intention to offend or something else...pleas believe me I am affected by that...and my problem not refer solely at this texture it happen with all. It seems that in tested object is a secret modifier or script...I mean is something in addition.

Regards.
report abuse
vote down
vote up

Votes: +0
Volinschi Sergiu wrote on March 07, 2010
 
Title: ...
I fix the blur problems and rescale to 2048/2048 with base main pattern 1024x4...
Many thanks to Russell L Thomas !
report abuse
vote down
vote up

Votes: +0
Russell L Thomas wrote on March 08, 2010
 
Title: Hey There
Hey, I was just pointing out what it seemed like to me and how I thought file sizes could be saved, wasn't saying you had to change anything! ;) Thanks for being pro-active with your material and for sharing it. Much appreciated!
report abuse
vote down
vote up

Votes: +0
Volinschi Sergiu wrote on March 08, 2010
 
Title: ...
I must thank, you make me to open one`s eyes very wide and see the errors...Anyway, I like to learn even I'm rusty.

I'm honored.
Regards.
report abuse
vote down
vote up

Votes: +0
hh78530 wrote on March 14, 2010
 
Title: mentalray
Title: Texture Quality
You have very large texture files (files add up to 17.3 megs archived) and yet at actual pixel viewing they are blurry as if you started with a lower resolution file and up-sampled them. I reduced them by a factor of 4 in a bi-cubic sharpen 3 step method and will render it out to see if there is any downgrade in quality, by I think it will look just as good and reduce the overall file sizes tremendously.
report abuse
vote down
vote up

Votes: +0

Write comment
You must be logged in to post a comment. Please register if you do not have an account yet.

busy